It is the only mystery from the dissection

The ordinary curse is by surprise, exacerbating an already disastrous fate unexpected. The Matignon was that wise and nevertheless willing victims worse, pleased. It is one of the paradoxes of a situation which is not stingy, as demonstrates method the book that he spent Françoise Fressoz, columnist for the "voices", and his brother "Southwest" Bruno Dive.

"The impossible mission" may be known as such, volunteers are legion. Those who are considering and probably lacking must recommend the reading of this book, which, fortunately, will inform all those who read more selflessly and not less interesting. Each fare more profit analysis is fine, very documented, and are known to be serious without ceasing to be pleasant. Rich anecdotes, some already known others unpublished, but always at the service of the demonstration adds a clear, precise, never pedantic style.

In fact, it remains confused the difficulty of the task. And this is an unfortunate and a single unfortunate to date carefully on the presidential anvil then exposed to all hammers which are handled by the view, meetings, parties, unions, Governments and even his colleagues. Must also respond to the often frenzied moment in entering the duration, even if he ignores his own, and load on his shoulders all discontent. How wonder while seventeen personalities who, under the Fifth Republic, had this painful honor him all lived in suffering and, for one, is there not survived

The mystery of happiness

This is the book explains well and making useful and often exciting. Once closed, it remained a question mark and a regret. The query comes from the observation, authors themselves, two Prime Ministers, Jacques Chaban-Delmas and Michel Rocard, out of Matignon in form, their failure is that later. Have they not proven that it is possible to survive in the service, even if left to to other, better inspired then to complete the demonstration If so, the curse would be reduced to the level of coincidence. The regret is too modest share left to happiness. It is the only mystery from the dissection. No doubt because obvious, it evokes neither the indescribable pride that accompanies the appointment but also the exercise, or satisfaction intimate, sometimes the thrills, very real, tangible authority, nor the meaning of the work done when a measure succeeded. That said, even if they are less visible, these moments of pleasure stolen, that all could know, sharing with one or two inner force of this very privileged moment where you are at the head of a Government Many veterans who eventually admit that the war beyond its horrors and suffering, was the most exciting period of their lives. The former Prime Ministers are not very far from this state of mind.

The book requires the question he addresses in conclusion: the function will evolve, disappear Paradox that is, first, to enumerate all the Prime Minister must be done, which is considerable, for then it can be deleted! As these tasks would not disappear, should they reviennet in the Elysee Palace, who could not fulfill. As to the comparison with abroad Tony Blair or Angela Merkel to , it omits two essential elements. The first is that there is a head of State, which symbolizes the nation and provides this concern the Prime Minister. Then, parliamentary democracies are often, even if they are ignored in France, another form of diarchy, in which a major Minister see Gordon Brown competition the leader of the Government as much as the second.

Believe that the five years makes it less necessary Prime Minister is a view of the spirit. Yes, service is difficult, not impossible, but it was not designed for the comfort of those who occupied it. And since it is expected of him, as said de Gaulle, "that it lasts and it endures," the curse will last also but, the authors, those genius it cannot complain of having been warned...